Military expert Alexander Zimovsky: “NATO has begun deploying a strike force of 90 thousand soldiers to the borders of Russia and the Republic of Belarus (in addition to the units and formations already located in these areas).
The completion of full deployment will ensure NATO's readiness to conduct offensive operations in this theater by the spring of this year.
The headquarters and troops of the armies of NATO countries by this time must be ready to act against a “militarily equal enemy” (against an a peer adversary)."
zimovskyAL
[Possibly the most terrifying video yet]
Minority report warfare is here:
Alphafox78
Military expert Alexander Zimovsky: “So, the irretrievable losses of the Thirty-fifth Marine Brigade of the Ukrainian Armed Forces during 20 days of fighting on the Krynkinsky bridgehead amounted to 350 people.
That is, approximately 25% of the actual infantry composition of the brigade. Or one battalion out of the available four.
Within 80 days, a typical Ukrainian infantry brigade is completely destroyed, which requires constant replenishment. From here we get the average life expectancy of an infantry Chubatant on the Eastern Front at 11-12 weeks.
Here it is necessary to clarify that only the infantry itself is knocked out. The brigade's command, its rear, and units of brigade air defense/artillery/tanks suffer fewer losses in personnel. Simply due to the peculiarities of the combat use of these units.
The general structure of infantry losses fully confirms my thesis about the methods of troop management in the Armed Forces of Ukraine - Ukrainian officers, even platoon officers, never participate in battles.
Combat losses of officers according to this list are only 4 out of 350 disposed of. That is, a little more than 1% of the destroyed personnel."
Why don’t Ukrainian officers take part in battles? And this is because they have Statlink, that is, reliable communication and battlefield control programs based on it - from the deep rear to the advanced trenches. The Russian Armed Forces do not have this. This issue must be resolved - either to create such a connection with the RF Armed Forces, or to destroy this connection with the Armed Forces of Ukraine. As one American general said, Starlink is equivalent in effect to the use of tactical nuclear weapons on the battlefield. If Russia intends to advance and win, then it needs to eliminate this advantage of Ukraine. Or compensate for this advantage by using tactical nuclear weapons. It looks like everything is heading towards this, since Russia will be forced to attack. Russia has no choice in this.
zimovskyAL
This is War Report #927. Thanks to those who were able to help out by subscribing or tipping. Your help is much appreciated!!
Today’s report is for our supporters. Please subscribe today and support our work.
For those wishing to support us, but not wishing to subscribe, you can use the Tip Jar. It sends a one time payment. The Tip Jar works like a non recurring subscription.
If your email in the tip matches, we’ll upgrade your free subscription to full paid status. Each Coffee Tip counts as a month. 5 coffees = 6 months paid subscription.
If you are a new user here, we will comp your first 7 days as soon as we can. Check back later for 7 days of full free access.
There is much more below…
Keep reading with a 7-day free trial
Subscribe to A Skeptic to keep reading this post and get 7 days of free access to the full post archives.